Readers: I am reposting this letter in order to help disseminate the arguments. Please feel free to reproduce this letter any way you see fit.
To:
Ms. Ashley Reynolds
490 Bear Cub Drive
Ridgway, CO 81432
Phone: 617.226.9927
ashley.reynolds@mullen.com
Ms. Reynolds:
I am writing in response to the press release from the Grain Foods Foundation that describes your effort to “discredit” the assertions made in my book, Wheat Belly: Lose the wheat, lose the weight and find your path back to health. I’d like to address several of the criticisms of the book made in the release:
” . . . the author relies on anecdotal observations rather than scientific studies.”
While I do indeed have a large anecdotal experience removing wheat in thousands of people, witnessing incredible and unprecedented weight loss and health benefits, I also draw from the experiences already documented in clinical studies. Several hundred of these studies are cited in the book (of the thousands available) and listed in the Reference section over 16 pages. These are studies that document the neurologic impairment unique to wheat, including cerebellar ataxia and dementia; heart disease via provocation of the small LDL pattern; visceral fat accumulation and all its attendant health consequences; the process of glycation via amylopectin A of wheat that leads to cataracts, diabetes, and arthritis; among others. There are, in fact, a wealth of studies documenting the adverse, often crippling, effects of wheat consumption in humans and I draw from these published studies.
“Wheat elimination ‘means missing out on a wealth of essential nutrients.’”
This is true–if the calories of wheat are replaced with candy, soft drinks, and fast food. But if lost wheat calories are replaced by healthy foods like vegetables, nuts, healthy oils, meats, eggs, cheese, avocados, and olives, then there is no nutrient deficiency that develops with elimination of wheat. There is no deficiency of any vitamin, including thiamine, folate, B12, iron, and B6; no mineral, including selenium, magnesium, and zinc; no polyphenol, flavonoid, or antioxidant; no lack of fiber. With regards to fiber, please note that the original studies documenting the health benefits of high fiber intake were fibers from vegetables, fruits, and nuts, not wheat or grains.
People with celiac disease do indeed experience deficiencies of multiple vitamins and minerals after they eliminate all wheat and gluten from the diet. But this is not due to a diet lacking valuable nutrients, but from the incomplete healing of the gastrointestinal tract (such as the lining of the duodenum and proximal jejunum). In these people, the destructive effects of wheat are so overpowering that, unfortunately, some people never heal completely. These people do indeed require vitamin and mineral supplementation, as well as probiotics and pancreatic enzyme supplementation.
I pose several questions to you and your organization:
Why is the high-glycemic index of wheat products ignored?
Due to the unique properties of amylopectin A, two slices of whole wheat bread increase blood sugar higher than many candy bars. High blood glucose leads to the process ofglycation that, in turn, causes arthritis (cartilage glycation), cataracts (lens protein glycation), diabetes (glycotoxicity of pancreatic beta cells), hepatic de novo lipogenesisthat increases triglycerides and, thereby, increases expression of atherogenic (heart disease-causing) small LDL particles, leading to heart attacks. Repetitive high blood sugars that develop from a grain-rich diet are, in my view, very destructive and lead to weight gain (specifically visceral fat), insulin resistance, leptin resistance (leading to obesity), and many of the health struggles Americans now experience.
How do you account for the psychologic and neurologic effects of the wheat protein,gliadin?
Wheat gliadin has been associated with cerebellar ataxia, peripheral neuropathy, gluten encephalopathy (dementia), behavioral outbursts in children with ADHD and autism, and paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations in people with schizophrenia, severe and incapacitating effects for people suffering from these conditions.
How do you explain the quadrupling of celiac disease over the last 50 years and its doubling over the last 20 years?
I submit to you that, while this is indeed my speculation, it is the changes in genetic code and, thereby, antigenic profile, of the high-yield semi-dwarf wheat cultivars now on the market that account for the marked increase in celiac potential nationwide. As you know, “hybridization” techniques, including chemical mutagenesis to induce selective mutations, leads to development of unique strains that are not subject to animal or human safety testing–they are just brought to market and sold.
Why does the wheat industry continue to call chemical mutagenesis, gamma irradiation, and x-ray irradiation “traditional breeding techniques” that you distinguish from genetic engineering? Chemical mutagenesis using the toxic mutagen, sodium azide, of course, is the method used to generate BASF’s Clearfield herbicide-resistant wheat strain. These methods are being used on a wide scale to generate unique genetic strains that are, without question from the FDA or USDA, assumed to be safe for human consumption.
In short, my view on the situation is that the U.S. government, with its repeated advice to “eat more healthy whole grains,” transmitted via vehicles like the USDA Food Pyramid and Food Plate, coupled with the extensive genetic transformations of the wheat plant introduced by agricultural geneticists, underlie an incredible deterioration in American health. I propose that you and your organization, as well as the wheat industry and its supporters, are at risk for legal liability on a scale not seen since the tobacco industry was brought to task to pay for the countless millions who died at their product’s hands.
I would be happy and willing to talk to you personally. I would also welcome the opportunity to debate you or any of your experts in a public forum.
Wiliam Davis, MD
Author, Wheat Belly: Lose the wheat, lose the weight and find your path back to health(Rodale, 2011)




William Davis, MD, is a preventive cardiologist whose unique approach to diet allows him to advocate reversal, not just prevention, of heart disease.
He is the founder of the 

Pingback: Baby Wheat Allergy Symptoms
Pingback: Buszujący w pszenicy « Nowa Debata
Pingback: Buszujący w pszenicy « PRACowniA
I have a few acres in my back yard. What if I grew wheat using heirloom seeds that are at least 50 years old? Would that wheat be healthy to eat?
Better, Jacques, but not necessarily good.
Remember: People who overconsumed breads and muffins even in the 19th century became obese and, I’m sure, suffered other related health problems.
But if I were to have an indulgence and had to choose between modern wheat and an heirloom strain, hands down it would be the heirloom strain.
Wondered if you had seen my review of your book…here it is!
http://iamthecuriouslibrarian.blogspot.com/2011_06_01_archive.html
Thanks, Donna!
Where’s your library?
I am a Reader Services Librarian at the East Meadow Public Library on Long Island, NY. I purchased your book for our library as soon as I knew it had come out and its going gangbusters-so happy to spread the word!
Oh you are a brave bloke. Thanks for telling it as you see it.
Hi, Carolyn–
I pride myself on being a bloke!
After what I’ve been seeing, I don’t see how I could live with myself and have a clear conscience without saying what I truly believe.
Pingback: Buszujący w pszenicy | P2M365.com
Pingback: Entrevista com o Dr. William Davis (Parte 2/2) | Vida Primal
Pingback: Thursday 1st December « KB CrossFit
Pingback: Thursday 1st December « KB CrossFit
Dr. Davis,
I am currently reading your book. I am studying to become a wholistic nutritionist, and would like to start a specialty bakery. Also I follow a number of diets including Dr. D’Adamo’s and Dr. Fiengold’s, and have been for years now. I tested negative for celiac’s, but due to my reaction to gluten my doctor and I concluded that I’m gluten sensitive. As a result I’ve switched myself and my whole family to spelt. This was quite easy since I already make everything I can from scratch including bread.
My question is: Has spelt been subjected to genetic alteration too? I can’t imagine it being altered as much as wheat, but knowing how much would still be nice. I tried searching for this information and can’t seem to find any answers.
Thank you
Hi, Tritia–
It’s that same old flawed argument from the nutrition community: If something bad is replaced with something less bad, then a whole bunch of the less bad thing must be good.
Spelt fits the “less bad” category. It is, without a doubt, less bad, since it has not been subjected to the extreme changes introduced into modern high-yield wheat. But it is not necessarily good. You can still become quite overweight and diabetic eating spelt, along with triggering of glycation and small LDL particles.
Dr. Davis,
I am/was an active artisan baker. Now that I am wheat free and following a Paleo food menu,I am losing weight and my blood sugar numbers are lower than they have been in over 20 years. I’m not missing staying away from grains but I would like to re introduce my 100% Rye sour pumpernickel bread. I see that you avoid a direct answer on questions as to other grains beside wheat. Do you have any data or supporting studies that speak to other grains like spelt and rye?
I also see other Blog Dr’s say they eat corn tortillas 2-3 times a week while having Mexican foods. That begs the question about corn.
> … would like to re introduce my 100% Rye …
See first paragraph of:
http://www.wheatbellyblog.com/2011/10/gluten-free-is-for-sissies/
Modern rye can easily be just as big a problem as modern wheat. Heirloom rye may be slightly less hazardous, as with heirloom wheat.
> I also see other Blog Dr’s say they eat corn tortillas 2-3 times a week while
> having Mexican foods. That begs the question about corn.
Corn tortillas are definitely preferable to flour (I eat them), but require some caution. They are still high carb. They may be from BT or RR corn, with who-knows-what hazards there. For the acutely wheat sensitive, cross-contamination with wheat is highly likely; as an ingredient, from the work surface and from the cooking oil.
Great, Eric! You may be our first former artisan baker.
I don’t believe, however, that I avoid a direct answer on the non-wheat grains. It’s just that there is no one-size-fits-all answer.
Think of it this way: The carbohydrate sensitivity of an 105 pound, pre-menopausal 23-year old marathon runner will be different from a 297-pound, 60-year old sedentary truck driving male. There’s no way to generalize and cover all body types.
You are dealing with the question of individual carbohydrate sensitivity. Please go back a couple of months in this blog to see those discussions.